Leverage does not have to be dangerous. Non-recourse
debt on an
asset can serve to make a large
purchase more affordable. Taking out a
non-recourse loan on an already owned asset can actually reduce
risk, since the borrowed funds become yours, while the risk of
loss is transferred to the
lender. But
recourse debt is something else entirely. If you purchase some investments, and then
borrow with recourse debt to
buy more, you are now vulnerable to mark to
market losses in what you
own. Depending on the
precise terms of the debt, a
decline in the
value of your
holdings could
force you either to
put up more collateral--which you may not have--or to
sell off some of the investments you purportedly like to meet margin calls. By
borrowing, you have ceased to be the master of your own fate and allowed the lender--or actually the market--to be.